Revision 1 (proof)

Atualizado
Hi everyone.

Common Counting Errors:
snapshot
What I am trying to tell you is that wave 4, breaks the guidelines, unfortunately, Almost all ideas (wave 4=$ 35400) are wrong!
Logarithmic scale = just better visualize exponential growth!,

Proof:
wave 4=$ 35400 = More than 63% Retracement of Wave 3 and 50% of the time!

Wave 4 Ratios:
Wave 4 is related to Wave 3 by one of the following:
Wave 4 = either 24%, 38% or 50% of Wave 3

Wave 4 = 35400 -- 50%--> Wave 3 = 70800 (incorrect)
Wave 4 = 35400 -- 38%--> Wave 3 = 93157 (incorrect)
Wave 4 = 35400 -- 24%--> Wave 3 = 126428 (incorrect)

Appendix:
Corrective phase- Corrective waves (various combinations):
1-Double zigzag (5-3-5-wave x-5-3-5)
2-Double three (5-3-5-wave x-3-3-3-3-3)
3-Double three (5-3-5-wave x-3-3-5)
4-Double flat (3-3-5-wave x-3-3-5)
5-Double three (3-3-5-wave x-3-3-3-3-3)
6-Triple zigzag (5-3-5-wave x-5-3-5-wave x-5-3-5)
7-Triple three (5-3-5-wave x-5-3-5-wave x-3-3-3-3-3)
8-Triple three (5-3-5-wave x-3-3-5-wave x-3-3-3-3-3)

Large Wave X :
1-Double three (3-3-5-wave X-3-3-3-3-3)
2-Double three (3-3-5-wave X-3-3-5)
3-Triple three (3-3-5-wave X-3-3-5-wave X-3-3-3-3-3)
4-Triple three (3-3-5-wave X-3-3-5-wave X-3-3-5)

snapshot
Nota
snapshot
Beyond Technical AnalysisBitcoin (Cryptocurrency)BTCUSDBTCUSDTTrend Analysis

Também em:

Publicações relacionadas

Aviso legal