Bitcoin to C. P-Modeling Pt 23. Model N & April 19th
Atualizado
This is Part 23 of my theoretical geometricc linear regression modeling from 3.22.18, "Bitcoin to C". Come back for updates. :) The modeling sequence starts at Model A, and ends at Model N. Model N SHOULD be the last model for this sequence.. We have arrived at the end of an operator and a crucial turning point for bitcoin. Model O will be rendered IF we do not break any rules of the modeling sequence. But that is going to be VERY hard to not break the rules in order to get to Model O.
Each model is strictly built off of the preceding model's geometricc regression points. The regression points from each model, creates a geometricc pattern of indicators in various forms, that can be read to PREDICT future trend movement, before traditional indicators appear.
The idea here is to convince you, that what i am doing is not arbitrary but unique and useful. I know the immediate inclination is to doubt what I am doing. That is expected.. and understandable.. But human nature is unpredictable. And you never know when you can learn new things and be completely shocked at someones EXTREMELY insane ideas.. I like going against the norm..
Understand the application of my modeling technique is not traditional by any means. It is theoretical in nature, and 100% experimentally designed and applied by me as we continue this insane experiment day after day.. It was not built for financial analysis, at all. I have literally 0 background in trading, TA's or anything to do with accounting or the stock market. It is being applied, through intuitive and creative means for fun so I could keep up with Bitcoin and Ethereum and invest at the right time. I promise I will make many mistakes making these non-traditional TA's, or even incorrectly use traditional tools and indicators. That is the fun of it, to learn from scratch and apply another idea to a realm unknown to you. This realm is an unknown to me. A knowledge acquisition process. One i am quite enjoying..
Why did Model M not fail?
A model is rendered if we meet the following conditions:
- Minimum of two mainframe connects and/or intersects.
- We must connect with the previous model.
- Lastly, does the model sequence have space for it naturally.
All 3 of those conditions are met with Model N.
So what about Statistical Outlier #28?
Well let me explain..
-Behold.... our first double Model outlier! Huh? Double Outlier?
-It is no secret the last few days have been controlled by WHALES and BOTS. We entered another suppression zone.. This was a highly controlled suppression zone by many factions it seems. Model M, was caught in a suppression zone. Thus the modeling sequence did not account for this suppression zone since it is not possible to at the moment. We got very close to re-entry but whatever entities were in control at that time, denied it. Thus we got stuck in a suppression pattern. VERY CLEARLY.
In order to complete this double outlier we need to make entry into the lower boundary of Model N. This will set keep Model M and N both true..
So now that we are finally breaking out of the suppression zone, we must move up, as suppression is just that.. Accumulation and suppressing the price that reason.
The logic tells me.. We are going to meet our goal..
Buckle the fuck up.. I could of be 100% wrong and it is very possible that I am.. But what if.. This all works.. The sky is the limit.. and this will set in motion a new way of looking at TA in crypto.
April 19th shows the end of an operator.. criticality has been detected.. Change blows in the wind..
As always, thanks for looking!
Glitch420
Each model is strictly built off of the preceding model's geometricc regression points. The regression points from each model, creates a geometricc pattern of indicators in various forms, that can be read to PREDICT future trend movement, before traditional indicators appear.
The idea here is to convince you, that what i am doing is not arbitrary but unique and useful. I know the immediate inclination is to doubt what I am doing. That is expected.. and understandable.. But human nature is unpredictable. And you never know when you can learn new things and be completely shocked at someones EXTREMELY insane ideas.. I like going against the norm..
Understand the application of my modeling technique is not traditional by any means. It is theoretical in nature, and 100% experimentally designed and applied by me as we continue this insane experiment day after day.. It was not built for financial analysis, at all. I have literally 0 background in trading, TA's or anything to do with accounting or the stock market. It is being applied, through intuitive and creative means for fun so I could keep up with Bitcoin and Ethereum and invest at the right time. I promise I will make many mistakes making these non-traditional TA's, or even incorrectly use traditional tools and indicators. That is the fun of it, to learn from scratch and apply another idea to a realm unknown to you. This realm is an unknown to me. A knowledge acquisition process. One i am quite enjoying..
Why did Model M not fail?
A model is rendered if we meet the following conditions:
- Minimum of two mainframe connects and/or intersects.
- We must connect with the previous model.
- Lastly, does the model sequence have space for it naturally.
All 3 of those conditions are met with Model N.
So what about Statistical Outlier #28?
Well let me explain..
-Behold.... our first double Model outlier! Huh? Double Outlier?
-It is no secret the last few days have been controlled by WHALES and BOTS. We entered another suppression zone.. This was a highly controlled suppression zone by many factions it seems. Model M, was caught in a suppression zone. Thus the modeling sequence did not account for this suppression zone since it is not possible to at the moment. We got very close to re-entry but whatever entities were in control at that time, denied it. Thus we got stuck in a suppression pattern. VERY CLEARLY.
In order to complete this double outlier we need to make entry into the lower boundary of Model N. This will set keep Model M and N both true..
So now that we are finally breaking out of the suppression zone, we must move up, as suppression is just that.. Accumulation and suppressing the price that reason.
The logic tells me.. We are going to meet our goal..
Buckle the fuck up.. I could of be 100% wrong and it is very possible that I am.. But what if.. This all works.. The sky is the limit.. and this will set in motion a new way of looking at TA in crypto.
April 19th shows the end of an operator.. criticality has been detected.. Change blows in the wind..
As always, thanks for looking!
Glitch420
Nota
GO BABY GO!!!Nota
I got an extremely good feeling about this.. Nota
Last chance bitcoin... Last chance.. show me what you got.. I have targeted the 3/1 Gann Fan boundary line.. This is a 500$ squeeze target.. Pretty bold and risky.. but I will give it a shot.. I have nothing to lose honestly.. I like bold.. Nota
Goodnight.. Let us hope for the holy green dildo by the time i wake up! Doubtful.. but we running out of space!Nota
The great thing about a dynamic theoretical model, is that you learn as you go and when you think you are going to fail, another opportunity presents itself.. You adapt to the conditions presented. So we have adapted once again, and i prematurely said we had not more room. Behold more room.. I apologize I will be keeping it short over the next few days. I am ultra sick. My energy is insanely low, my body and throat hurts. This sucks.. But hey... you new know... We created a perfect pyramid. Perfect symmetrical models are rare, but who am i kidding.. I am going to go lay down now..Nota
Do you see what i see? We may literally find the only path to not break any rules to create Model O... Re-entry into Model N would complete the double model statistical outlier. Once we enter Model N and if we blasted out the side, this will be statistical outlier #29. You can see where i marked it. This exit point would keep us to the Gann Fan boundary line 3/1.Nota
Change is in the air... Big change.. mind blowing change.. or maybe I am just really sick and delirious.. 0_oNota
Target 9200. T-Minus 27 minutes. 94%. Target 7500. 6%
Nota
RE-ENTRY COMPLETE! Model N is now True.
Proposition .9
We have successfully completed Statistical Outlier #28.
Statistical Outlier #28 is the first Double Outlier in my modeling sequence.
Target 9200+. 96%.
Target 7500. 4%
Nota
Prepare for liftoff.. Nota
99.6% Target 9200+. (balls of steel). Nota
Nota
Show me a nice big green dildo please.. 7 minutes.. Nota
Timer re-set. 25 minutes. Nota
Here we go.. Nota
:) Nota
Nope.. Next one.. 12hr/6hr. My bad.. premature call. 1hr. 19min..
Publicações relacionadas
Aviso legal
As informações e publicações não devem ser e não constituem conselhos ou recomendações financeiras, de investimento, de negociação ou de qualquer outro tipo, fornecidas ou endossadas pela TradingView. Leia mais em Termos de uso.